Wednesday, May 25, 2005

Land of the Free?

Not to get too doom-and-gloomy here but a pair of reports seem to be telling us that something is rotten in the state of Denmark. About a month ago Freedom House issued a press release on their recent study of freedom of the press across the world. Care to guess where the US fell in? I'll give you a hint: we beat out Australia, France and the UK BUT Germany, Portugal, Ireland, New Zealand, and all of Scandanavia were ranked above us. In all 28 other countries were deemed to have a freer press then the United States. That's right, the country who's birth was midwived by Thomas Payne's Common Sense is number 29 in the world.

How did we fall from greatness? Freedom House explains in their press release:
While the United States remained one of the strongest performers in the survey, its numerical score declined due to a number of legal cases in which prosecutors sought to compel journalists to reveal sources or turn over notes or other material they had gathered in the course of investigations. Additionally, doubts concerning official influence over media content emerged with the disclosures that several political commentators received grants from federal agencies, and that the Bush administration had significantly increased the practice of distributing government-produced news segments.
Well, we're still considered "free" but it is clear that we've moved in the wrong direction and should expect better of ourselves.

But we're still the standard bearer of human rights in the world, right? Well...once again we see some "slippage". Amnesty International cites a decline of human rights worldwide and the US (perhaps, again, because we have so far to fall) is leading the charge. In a CNN.com article today, AI's Secretary General Irene Khan said in the foreword to their 2005 annual report,
"When the most powerful country in the world thumbs its nose at the rule of law and human rights, it grants a licence to others to commit abuse with impunity." Additionally, she noted, "The detention facility at Guantanamo Bay has become the gulag of our times, entrenching the practice of arbitrary and indefinite detention in violation of international law."

According to the CNN.com article, the report declares, "U.S. President George W. Bush often said his country was founded on and dedicated to the cause of human dignity -- but there was a gulf between rhetoric and reality." A gulf between rhetoric and reality? Isn't that the motto of the neo-cons?

8 Comments:

At 6:01 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Good citations, criticisms, and analysis. I wish others would find it as easy to connect the dots. Rome is burning....

 
At 10:12 AM, Blogger Mindwyrm said...

So Freedom House criteria for freedom of the press includes whether or not the government puts out any propaganda and whether or not an attorney tries to get info. Sorry, I don't see where either of those is a big deal. Every government produces propaganda but the main media source is still free to do whatever it wishes and does so. Prosecutors trying, and failing, to get info also doesn't infringe on the freedom of the press. When the judges start ordering sources revealed then complain about it.

Amnesty International: I really pretty much lost all respect for these people. They talk about Gitmo being a gulag and then turn around and call for kidnapping of US officials. They ignore true tragedies like Darfur and instead are claiming that the US "thumbs its nose at the rule of law and human rights." I guess those trials for the soldiers at Abu G were my imagination? I guess the almost 200 investigations by the DoD to verify that there wasn't any basis for the torture claims were all written by Tom Clancy then. So the ACLU review of the FBI report for gitmo that found no credible torture complaints was bogus too? C'mon guys. Please join the real world and deal with facts not fantasy.

 
At 2:07 PM, Blogger Kokopelli said...

Presuming to understand Freedom House's criteria from a tiny excerpt when links to the entire report were available is a bit lazy. Then you try to build your case on this non-point to discredit the entire report? You should note that the US did slip down in our "freedom score", we are still deemed "free" in the eyes of Freedom House. The point is, we are slipping. That you do not see how a democracy, dependent upon a free and independant press, is injured when journalistic integrity has been seriously impugned is a grave oversight on your part.

And, what do you mean "ignore tragedies like Darfur"? Do a search on their site and you will find that AI has be declaiming the human rights violations there since February 2003.

Hone your critical thinking skills, open your eyes to the real world, and deal with facts and not bromides from "your team".

 
At 6:57 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Typical Liberal/Leftist poppycock! :) Baffers - blame America first for every wrong !!

 
At 7:35 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Freedom House has an opinion and that is all - not a consensus.

 
At 12:40 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The left seems to think their opinion is fact and everything else is rubbish.

 
At 7:43 AM, Blogger Kokopelli said...

Ironic, isn't it, that opposing forces such as "Paul" and "Anonymous" deride the mere opinions of the left but offer not a single point of fact to bolster their own position. Oh how I long for the days when discussions like these were more substantive than, "Oh yeah, well that's just your opinion. I have a right to my opinion too! So neener, neener, neener; I'm right so you must be wrong." How pathetic.

 
At 11:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What would be the point in debating you Koko?

You are so wrapped up in your own opinions you can't see the world from any other perspective.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home